Erling Braut Haaland gave Norway the lead at Friends Arena – after a suspicious penalty kick occurred in its wake.
After the match, former referee Jonas Eriksson’s dossier presented his theory of how referee Anthony Taylor had taken a penalty.
Judges are often influenced by past experiences, situations, and events, as he writes and refers to a penal case last year.
He was in a duel between Morten Thorsby and Emile Kraft Norway also granted a much-discussed penalty during Sunday’s League of Nations meeting.
– It’s so awful. “If we have VAR but we don’t see it, we don’t need VAR,” said national captain Jan Andersson after the match.
Erling Braut Haaland took the penalty and set the goal for Norway.
Now gives the former professional referee and now the studio expert Jonas Ericsson his opinion of the situation.
– I find it difficult to explain the breakdown in the referee team – but I will try, Eriksson writes on Instagram and continues:
Judges are often influenced by past experiences, situations, and events. These often get stronger if it’s the same team, arena or similar situation, it develops and points to a position at Friends Arena 2021 when Sweden met Spain. A case in which Emile Kraft was involved until then.
In this case, Sweden was acquitted by Judge Anthony Taylor and there was no penalty. Something Jonas Ericsson thinks is wrong.
The VAR chamber did not change the resolution either.
– Thus, the same VAR has two major mistakes in the same arena with the same referee. I understand those who do not want where when such obvious errors are allowed. Erikson wrote that he was also properly drained from a restroom.
