Niklas Wakegaard and Roger Runeberg still disagree.
The feud between the profiles continued ahead of France’s away game against Malmö on Saturday.
Thin Roger’s analysis is almost the same as his own, says Wikegård at studio C More.
Frölunda hasn’t made it to the playoffs since the team won the gold in 2019 and two weeks ago, expert Niklas Wikegård and coach Roger Rönnberg disagreed about why.
Wikegård called Rönnberg hockey “outdated” and continued to criticize Frölunda at studio C More ahead of Saturday’s team game against Malmö.
– I still think that if Frölunda wants to come back and win again, you have to develop your game further, you have to do things a little differently. Play another game. That’s what the whole thing is about for me, says Wikegård in the studio.
Rönnberg’s answer
Among other things, he criticizes Frölunda for playing intensely and for being easy to read – a criticism to which Rönnberg had to respond.
Yes, but that (easy to read) we should be, we are consistent in our game idea, says Runeberg in C More and then continues:
– I think the analysis is very weak. It is not just the idea of the game that determines whether we win or lose. It’s the number of goals we score for us, which we often get, and it’s not just about the idea of the game. This is how my group leaders and I can cultivate creativity, I think. This analysis is very weak.
“handcuffs”
Niklas Wikigaard Then I was met with the same answer Roger Runberg.
– I think Roger’s answer is also very weak. Wikegård says in the studio that “we as leaders should worship creativity” is simply saying that we are “playing a monotonous game rather than being creative” and adds that creative players have problems at Frölunda.
Where did the creative players go? They tied their hands and made no choice. So Roger’s thin analysis is almost as weak as mine.
