UP SELL. Five points for each Sirius-AIK Bohmann about IP for students.
1. Even AIK wouldn’t be overwhelmed with this, right?
AIK’s Easy Table™ proved challenging with points lost to Varberg and Degerfors. But now the weakest team in Allsvenskan was still waiting. Sirius with great concern over Diggerforce and Farberg’s continued recording. Which came with flickering after five consecutive losses.
At the same time, all contenders lost points. Djurgorden, Haaken, Hammarby and Malmö acted very generously, almost gently, against AIK in this round. They gave Gnaget a golden free ticket and a direct invitation to the grand battle.
Surely even this year’s unreliable version of AIK could overwhelm this situation?
2. Most of all, he was humble
AIK now has a political decision that the team must play forward-facing football. But it takes no change of laws to convince Henok Joytum, Juanma Lilo’s savior, that this is the right way to go.
Everything was balanced very offensively 4-3-3/4-2-4 as Nabil Bahwi, Yassin Ayari and Nicholas Stefanelli swept around John Gedetti.
They sometimes succeeded in shutting down Sirius’ running tracks, for the most part. Gnaget had a bit more ball, and Sirius probably had a half chance after moderate shots from outside. It was even, but mostly it was mediocre.
3. Fight like a knife with butter knives
It was all so terrible… relentlessly.
It was like watching two sneaky men challenge each other to a knife fight armed with butter knives they had carved and sanded into the woodwork.
It never got serious.
Sirius was petty because he is a group of young players trained by a small coach. Having said that, it must be emphasized that Sirius has been clear for a long time that his performance was better based on their circumstances than AIK could have done. AIK and Goitom had good intentions in their game plan, but the blur in the final third was great. Sebastian Larsson neglected constant positions and posts. Eric Otieno wandered offside. John Guidetti didn’t hit the balls that are rarely hit.
It felt like you were standing in the stands and screaming, “You know you can shoot, right?”
4. Finally despair!
Finally some despair!
Maybe that’s how everyone at Studenternas felt during the second half. The match picture opened wide with an opportunistic cross as a result.
Tshriq Matthews and Christian Kwaku stepped forward in dangerous situations. Eric Otieno and Nicholas Stefanelli auditioned for David Mitoff Nelson on the other short side.
Sirius’ main target was not unfair. In general, it is likely to be a little better, and has a clearer interaction. Daniel Stinson hit the corner and an enthusiastic Philip Rojcic won the first duel. The nick knuckle ended right in front of Tim Björkstrom, who forced 1-0.
5. What do you call the person who threw away three free tickets? ungrateful
With a quarter left to play, AIK woke up. And once they were overpowered, the pressure was total. In no time, John Gedetti transformed from a comfortable domestic cat into a roaring lion. He was hitting everything and yelling at everyone. Gediti united with Yassin Ayari, but the talented Markus Matissen saved the ball on the goal line.
In the end, untitled Sebastian Larsson earned quality play and then Tim Björkstrom couldn’t prove himself against giant half-giant Sotirios Papagianopoulos, who split the score 1-1.
For the rest of the match, AIK was under hysterical pressure as he suddenly got an outlet for all the weight, quality and mediocre routine found on this team. Butter knives were replaced with daggers. David Mitoff Nelson became a wall and once defeated, John Gedetti kicked a bike. The teams fought for their lives for every one meter of Sirius’ penalty area. The effect was nothing short of brutal, and AIK still has to respect this attack, and Sirius for how to (partially) survive it.
AIK أداء performance 
Football for 15 minutes but it was lukewarm 
At 75. Throw the free ticket to the first battle. second. And what do you really call someone who declines three invitations in a row?
ungrateful.