Explanation of failure to inform the Disciplinary Committee of Edwin Hammerlund

ÖRNSKÖLDSVIK. Edvin Hammerlund has not been flagged for audit.

Referee Björn Wettergren explains why Djurgårdsbacken is not in danger of being shut down.

– it is judged to be a very sticky negligence or cross-checking, but more than he receives it he pushes wildly through the motion of cross-checking, he says.

Edvin Hammarlund got two minutes to cross-check with Oscar Pettersson in Modo.

After that, the players and managers at Modo thought there would be a disciplinary committee report and Edvin Hammarlund himself thought he would get a match penalty.

Later on Wednesday evening, it became clear that there would be no further action.

– The referees then thought it could have been five minutes plus misconduct in the match (match penalty). I agree with that. Just like all the other cases in the border country, he went to the reference group and their assessment is that it’s not violent enough to make a report, says Bjorn Wettergren.

Then they have to surrender.

Christopher Volkstrand, who was the main referee with Daniel Wiesner, admitted afterwards that it should have been a penalty.

Among those who raged against the situation and the referee’s assessment was Peter “Phopa” Forsberg in the stands.

– Why don’t they take a five and review the review? There must be at least three matches. Too bad if not reported. Then they have to give up, says ‘Foppa’

Djurgården won their match 5:7 in the Hockeyallsvenskan final in Örnsköldsvik.

Modu leads the series 3-2 in matches and Game 6 will be played at Hovet in Stockholm on Friday night.

See also  Mika Zibanejad's 250 goal to lead the Rangers to victory over Florida

Leave a Comment