Modo stops Joseph Engman from filming.
I’m not a hockey expert.
But I know bullshit populist decision when I see one.
Are you against photography?
And the!
Did Joseph Engmann make a movie against Djurgården?
And the!
Does he stop?
Yes! Or at least to be punished in some way until the mischief is gone, so that hockey is not far behind for the wretched children and b-actors.
Hell no, I mean
By now, most people would agree, I think, but that’s not what the Joseph Engman case is about. However, I wonder if some of the 90 percent who voted in Sportbladet’s poll that Modo is right to suspend their player actually answered any of the above questions.
What matters is whether the club should deviate from the usual arrangement in the event of possible infractions that could result in suspension or fines. If the lawyer has to move over to the plaintiff’s side and no longer protect his client but rather attack him.
Hell no, I mean. We have referees and disciplinary boards for a reason, to pre-empt their professional judgment is to belittle everyone involved.
This is how the system is built
What bothers me most is not that Engman was forced to abandon a losing streak fight in Kristianstad on Wednesday, but that the punishment seems very calculated and liberating for the crowd. Does anyone think Modo is setting up a new practice that they intend to live up to in the future? Does anyone think David Bernhardt or Pontus Nassen could have been stopped in a deciding qualifier if they had handed out a steal the previous weekend?
No no.
The club has never acted like this before and will not do so later. It’s just now, because slow motion gifs are circulating on social media and everyone is seeing how ridiculous the hill is acting. It’s a way to calm the storm, and stop an oncoming bus by throwing your player in front of it.
Every time a player in Hockey Allsvenskan or the SHL is reported to the disciplinary committee, he or she is allowed to speak. The statement of defense is attached to the decision and is often comical in its attempt to cover up the brutality of the replays. In the week before last it was Theodor Nederbach’s turn, and the 21-year-old described his apparent rise as “putting me and the opponent in an unfortunate position at the moment of the tackle”.
Referee: Two matches suspended. naturally. However, modoite did the right thing in trying to get freedom, because that’s how the system was set up.
“never intended”
Of course, the association can suspend an employee from work if he intentionally harms his employer. If he is standing on the opponent’s heel or dealing with a teammate aggressively in training. If he acts inappropriately when drunk, on social media, or a combination of both. But this is because no other court can handle the case. During an Allsvenskan hockey match, the referees are in place with fully functional rules and a disciplinary committee to deal with the roughest stuff and misses.
that’s enough. There is no need for sports directors to put on a referee’s wig.
Josef Engman didn’t want to screw Modo up. He wanted to win at all costs and made two stupid decisions, clumsy attempts to manipulate dismissals. A sabotage that he had not planned in advance and was not proud of afterwards.
– That was not his intention, says sporting director Henrik Gradin.
no. So there were spontaneous actions during fiery matches, in inexplicable sports stagnation. Two fouls, according to the club.
But why turn it off then?
Isn’t it necessary to protect your player when making mistakes?