This was a rather quirky concoction

Am I finding something positive this evening?

Janes Cajost.

With this, you’re really done.

It doesn’t matter how you value and prioritize – losing international players competing at home is still a very bad habit.

Should we find that worrisome? we will. In terms of terms, it’s not strange or illogical for it to be the way it is or for it to end up the way it is.

Serbia came to Solna with a World Cup-ready squad, eleven more regular teams and a determinedly committed away division.

We have brought our little gnawed faith, our old doubts and our new doubts. We would probably all agree that it’s healthy to try to create a partially new game model. Finding the right player with eleven as many players had barely heard from each other ten days ago is still completely hopeless.

When we started the game, we probably had three or four regular players on the field, depending a bit on how we counted. Then Jock Nelson collapsed as well, letting us dig deep into the previously unknown maple cabin of the midfield box.

He met with Halaneng Edvin Kurtulus – a player for the Kosovo national under-21 team just two months ago – at the same time as the short Serbian side stubbornly echoed its view on Kosovo’s geopolitical situation.

Most things become difficult when nothing is easy.

thrown together

Frankly, I don’t think any analysis of our new game model can emerge from this match. This was not a team that would put their jointly tuned playing patterns into practice. This was a needy and complex group that tried to understand each other’s intentions as best they could.

See also  Lulia can make a decision against Färjestad - "Bulan" Berglund remembers missed opportunities

If we want to evaluate, we end up with individual efforts rather than group interaction, and if we want to try to find positive aspects, it is a very long way to first look at Hjalmar Ekdal and then leave our eyes. Jeans Cagust. He’s still not a healthy and fully trained in-house midfielder, but he has that rare ability to make very complicated moments look totally normal.

The match was not filled with anything at all

He can chew 70 meters of grass in a few seconds, and he can take out two opponents without even touching the ball.

Give him clear tactical directives and a duty-conscious Albin Ekdal on the side so we can get a good solution to the midfield problem we’ve had for almost all of Jan Andersson’s tenure as captain of the national team.

But if some tough moments were resolved with guts, we got rid of the match by neglecting the basics. In the offensive penalty area, Victor Claison made an uncharacteristic of two tackles, both tied a penalty kick, and at the other end of the field he donated Anthony Elanga Remove the unnecessary corner.

After a newly altered defense staff failed to count, Luka Jovic managed to score the Serbian goal in the last kick of the half – and so it was that night.

Unstructured Sweden made some sort of attempt in the second half, but it was mostly a matter of directionless individual actions that the smart and disciplined Serbs could comfortably avoid.

We can see the importance of the Nations League in different ways, but it is always up to your team to load international matches with meaning and value.

See also  His girlfriend Iris Tretsaris Gondal praised Marcus Ericsson

Tonight we didn’t really manage to fill this match with anything at all.

Ask your questions to Sportbladet columnist Erik Niva.

  • I honestly think that close to 25 thousand is a perfectly good number, even if it was helped by no less than 5 thousand Serbs.

    But the thing I don’t really understand is that it unlocks three floors for a match like this. With that audience in my lower runway section, and it looks perfectly acceptable here.

  • “People fail” votes are the square after the match. Nations League product had no effect, says SvFF

    For expensive tickets with a late game starting at 20.45 and useless connections from Solna, I say.

    Comment and potential action?

    johan

  • Is it…? She hasn’t had time to hear any interviews after that, but ‘good match’ in this case should refer to ‘untried players at least did their best and tried’ rather than ‘collective performance at an acceptable team level’.

  • Jan Anderson thought the team had a good game. do you agree?

    Stein Marcusen

  • surely. Perhaps the positive to be found – which is not spelled Jens Cajuste – was in a match we are more likely to be allowed to evaluate on an individual basis than on a team basis.

    Hjalmar was good, although I might not give it the prestigious rating.

Leave a Comment